Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 169
Filter
1.
Nat Commun ; 15(1): 3431, 2024 Apr 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38654015

ABSTRACT

The gut microbiota modulates response to hormonal treatments in prostate cancer (PCa) patients, but whether it influences PCa progression remains unknown. Here, we show a reduction in fecal microbiota alpha-diversity correlating with increase tumour burden in two distinct groups of hormonotherapy naïve PCa patients and three murine PCa models. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) from patients with high PCa volume is sufficient to stimulate the growth of mouse PCa revealing the existence of a gut microbiome-cancer crosstalk. Analysis of gut microbial-related pathways in mice with aggressive PCa identifies three enzymes responsible for the metabolism of long-chain fatty acids (LCFA). Supplementation with LCFA omega-3 MAG-EPA is sufficient to reduce PCa growth in mice and cancer up-grading in pre-prostatectomy PCa patients correlating with a reduction of gut Ruminococcaceae in both and fecal butyrate levels in PCa patients. This suggests that the beneficial effect of omega-3 rich diet is mediated in part by modulating the crosstalk between gut microbes and their metabolites in men with PCa.


Subject(s)
Fecal Microbiota Transplantation , Feces , Gastrointestinal Microbiome , Prostatic Neoplasms , Male , Prostatic Neoplasms/metabolism , Prostatic Neoplasms/diet therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/microbiology , Animals , Humans , Mice , Feces/microbiology , Fatty Acids, Omega-3/metabolism , Fatty Acids, Omega-3/administration & dosage , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Fatty Acids, Unsaturated/metabolism
2.
Curr Oncol Rep ; 26(5): 477-487, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38573440

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The role of the gut microbiome in prostate cancer is an emerging area of research interest. However, no single causative organism has yet been identified. The goal of this paper is to examine the role of the microbiome in prostate cancer and summarize the challenges relating to methodology in specimen collection, sequencing technology, and interpretation of results. RECENT FINDINGS: Significant heterogeneity still exists in methodology for stool sampling/storage, preservative options, DNA extraction, and sequencing database selection/in silico processing. Debate persists over primer choice in amplicon sequencing as well as optimal methods for data normalization. Statistical methods for longitudinal microbiome analysis continue to undergo refinement. While standardization of methodology may help yield more consistent results for organism identification in prostate cancer, this is a difficult task due to considerable procedural variation at each step in the process. Further reproducibility and methodology research is required.


Subject(s)
Gastrointestinal Microbiome , Prostatic Neoplasms , Prostatic Neoplasms/microbiology , Humans , Male , Microbiota , Feces/microbiology , Specimen Handling/methods
3.
Int J Mol Sci ; 23(16)2022 Aug 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36012113

ABSTRACT

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and prostate cancer (PCa) belong to the most frequent diseases in ageing men. It has been proposed that prostate chronic inflammation is a risk factor for the development of both BPH and PCa. However, potential stimuli that cause or maintain inflammation in the prostate gland are still poorly characterized. Bacterial infections seems to be one of the potential sources of prostatitis. Recent studies show that Propionibacterium acnes (P. acnes) is the most prevalent microorganism in the prostate gland and may be a predisposing factor for inflammation of prostatic tissue. It indicates that P. acnes may contribute to cancer development by enhancing proinflammatory responses, as well as by modifying the prostate extracellular environment. In this review, we discuss the potential role of P. acnes in the development of BPH and PCa and highlight the importance of regulatory T CD4(+)FoxP3(+) (Treg) and Th17 cells in response to P. acnes infection in the context of both prostate diseases.


Subject(s)
Prostatic Hyperplasia , Prostatic Neoplasms , Prostatitis , Humans , Immunity , Inflammation , Male , Propionibacterium acnes , Prostate , Prostatic Neoplasms/microbiology , Prostatitis/complications , T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory , Th17 Cells
4.
BMC Cancer ; 22(1): 794, 2022 Jul 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35854230

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most common cancer in men worldwide. The standard non-surgical approach for localized PCa is radiotherapy (RT), but one of the limitations of high-dose RT is the potential increase in gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicities. We present the protocol of the Microstyle study, a multicentre randomized two-arm crossover clinical trial. The primary outcome will be assessed at the end of 6-month intervention, by measuring the change in adherence to a healthy lifestyle score. The hypothesis is that modifying lifestyle we change microbiome and improve quality of life and decrease side effects of RT. METHODS: Study participants will be recruited among men undergoing RT in two Italian centers (Milan and Naples). We foresee to randomize 300 patients in two intervention arms: Intervention Group (IG) and Control Group (CG). Participants allocated to the IG will meet a dietitian and a physiotherapist before RT to receive personalized diet and exercise recommendations, according to their health status, to improve overall lifestyle and reduce side effects (bowel and/or urinary problems). Dietitian and physiotherapist will work together to set individualized goals to reduce or eliminate side effects and pain according to their health status. All participants (IG) will be given a pedometer device (steps counter) in order to monitor and to spur participants to increase physical activity and reduce sedentary behavior. Participants included in the CG will receive baseline general advice and materials available for patients undergoing RT. According to the cross-over design, the CG will cross to the intervention approach after 6-month, to actively enhance compliance towards suggested lifestyle recommendations for all patients. DISCUSSION: This trial is innovative in its design because we propose a lifestyle intervention during RT, that includes both dietary and physical activity counselling, as well as monitoring changes in microbiome and serum biomarkers. The promotion of healthy behaviour will be initiated before initiation of standard care, to achieve long lasting effects, controlling side effects, coping with feelings of anxiety and depression and improve efficacy of RT. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClincalTrial.gov registration number: NCT05155618 . Retrospectively registered on December 13, 2021. The first patient was enrolled on October 22, 2021.


Subject(s)
Life Style , Microbiota , Prostatic Neoplasms , Cross-Over Studies , Humans , Male , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Prostatic Neoplasms/microbiology , Prostatic Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Sedentary Behavior
5.
J Immunol Res ; 2022: 2574964, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35155686

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUNDS: Infection and inflammation play an important role in prostate cancer (PCa) etiology and pathogenesis. However, the environmental drivers for PCa are not fully understood. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, we analyzed circulating fungal microbiome in plasma samples from age and race-matched healthy control men (n = 34) and preoperative PCa patients (n = 31). RESULTS: The fungal community in the plasma exhibited differences between individuals with PCa and healthy controls according to the beta diversity; there was no difference in the alpha diversity. Moreover, the relative abundance of several fungi differed between the two study groups from the class to species levels. The most significant differences were Filobasidiales family, Pyronemataceae family, and Cryptococcus ater species, which were enriched in PCa patients compared to controls. The increased Bipolaris genus was associated with low prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, increased Sordariomycetes class was associated with severe pathological stage, and decreased Phoma herbarum species was associated with disease relapse, compared to corresponding controls. Several fungi from class to species levels were increased in the controls compared to patients. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to show plasma distinct fungal microbiome and its associations with PSA levels, relapse, and pathology stages in PCa patients.


Subject(s)
Bipolaris/physiology , Cryptococcus/physiology , Phoma/physiology , Prostatic Neoplasms/microbiology , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Healthy Volunteers , Humans , Male , Microbiota/genetics , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Neoplasm Staging , Prostate-Specific Antigen/blood
6.
Int J Mol Sci ; 23(4)2022 Feb 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35216332

ABSTRACT

Lard diet (LD) is a risk factor for prostate cancer (PCa) development and progression. Two immunocompetent mouse models fed with isocaloric specific fat diets (LD) enriched in saturated and monounsaturated fatty acid (SMFA), showed significanftly enhanced PCa progression with weight gain compared with a fish oil diet (FOD). High gut microbial divergency resulted from difference in diets, and the abundance of several bacterial species, such as in the orders Clostridiales and Lactobacillales, was markedly altered in the feces of LD- or FOD-fed mice. The proportion of the order Lactobacillales in the gut was negatively involved in SMFA-induced body weight gain and PCa progression. We found the modulation of lipid metabolism and cholesterol biosynthesis pathways with three and seven commonly up- and downregulated genes in PCa tissues, and some of them correlated with the abundance of the order Lactobacillales in mouse gut. The expression of sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor 2, which is associated with the order Lactobacillales and cancer progression in mouse models, was inversely associated with aggressive phenotype and weight gain in patients with PCa using the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus database. Therefore, SMFA may promote PCa progression with the abundance of specific gut microbial species and overexpression of lipogenic genes in PCa. Therapeutics with alteration of gut microbiota and candidate genes involved in diet-induced PCa progression may be attractive in PCa.


Subject(s)
Diet, High-Fat/adverse effects , Gastrointestinal Microbiome/physiology , Prostatic Neoplasms/microbiology , Prostatic Neoplasms/physiopathology , Animals , Clostridiales/physiology , Dietary Fats, Unsaturated/metabolism , Fatty Acids/metabolism , Feces/microbiology , Lipid Metabolism/physiology , Male , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Mice, Knockout , Obesity/metabolism , Obesity/microbiology , Obesity/physiopathology , Prostatic Neoplasms/metabolism , Weight Gain/physiology
7.
Microbiol Spectr ; 9(3): e0149721, 2021 12 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34937192

ABSTRACT

Tumors and infectious agents both benefit from an immunosuppressive environment. Cutibacterium acnes (C. acnes) is a bacterium in the normal skin microbiota, which has the ability to survive intracellularly in macrophages and is significantly more common in prostate cancer tissue compared with normal prostate tissue. This study investigated if prostate cancer tissue culture positive for C. acnes has a higher infiltration of regulatory T-cells (Tregs) and if macrophages stimulated with C. acnes induced the expression of immunosuppressive genes that could be linked to an increase of Tregs in prostate cancer. Real-time PCR and enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot assay (ELISA) were used to examine the expression of immunosuppressive genes in human macrophages stimulated in vitro with C. acnes, and associations between the presence of C. acnes and infiltration of Tregs were investigated by statistically analyzing data generated in two previous studies. The in vitro results demonstrated that macrophages stimulated with C. acnes significantly increased their expression of PD-L1, CCL17, and CCL18 mRNA and protein (p <0.05). In the cohort, Tregs in tumor stroma and tumor epithelia were positively associated with the presence of C. acnes (P = 0.0004 and P = 0.046, respectively). Since the macrophages stimulated with C. acnes in vitro increased the expression of immunosuppressive genes, and prostate cancer patients with prostatic C. acnes infection had higher infiltration of Tregs than their noninfected counterparts, we suggest that C. acnes may contribute to an immunosuppressive tumor environment that is vital for prostate cancer progression. IMPORTANCE In an immune suppressive tumor microenvironment constituted by immunosuppressive cells and immunosuppressive mediators, tumors may improve their ability to give rise to a clinically relevant cancer. In the present study, we found that C. acnes might contribute to an immunosuppressive environment by recruiting Tregs and by increasing the expression of immunosuppressive mediators such as PD-L1, CCL17, and CCL18. We believe that our data add support to the hypothesis of a contributing role of C. acnes in prostate cancer development. If established that C. acnes stimulates prostate cancer progression it may open up avenues for targeted prostate cancer treatment.


Subject(s)
Immune Tolerance/immunology , Macrophages/immunology , Propionibacteriaceae/immunology , Prostatic Neoplasms/immunology , Prostatic Neoplasms/microbiology , T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory/immunology , B7-H1 Antigen/biosynthesis , B7-H1 Antigen/genetics , Chemokine CCL17/biosynthesis , Chemokine CCL17/genetics , Chemokines, CC/biosynthesis , Chemokines, CC/genetics , Enzyme-Linked Immunospot Assay , Humans , Immune Tolerance/genetics , Male , Microbiota/immunology , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Tumor Escape/immunology , Tumor Microenvironment/immunology
8.
Int J Mol Sci ; 22(17)2021 Sep 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34502535

ABSTRACT

Gut microbiota are reported to be associated with many diseases, including cancers. Several bacterial taxa have been shown to be associated with cancer development or response to treatment. However, longitudinal microbiota alterations during the development of cancers are relatively unexplored. To better understand how microbiota changes, we profiled the gut microbiota composition from prostate cancer-bearing mice and control mice at five different time points. Distinct gut microbiota differences were found between cancer-bearing mice and control mice. Akkermansiaceae was found to be significantly higher in the first three weeks in cancer-bearing mice, which implies its role in the early stage of cancer colonization. We also found that Bifidobacteriaceae and Enterococcaceae were more abundant in the second and last sampling week, respectively. The increments of Akkermansiaceae, Bifidobacteriaceae and Enterococcaceae were previously found to be associated with responses to immunotherapy, which suggests links between these bacteria families and cancers. Additionally, our function analysis showed that the bacterial taxa carrying steroid biosynthesis and butirosin and neomycin biosynthesis were increased, whereas those carrying naphthalene degradation decreased in cancer-bearing mice. Our work identified the bacteria taxa altered during prostate cancer progression and provided a resource of longitudinal microbiota profiles during cancer development in a mouse model.


Subject(s)
Gastrointestinal Microbiome/physiology , Prostatic Neoplasms/microbiology , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Verrucomicrobia/physiology , Animals , Bacteria/classification , Bacteria/genetics , Bacteria/metabolism , Feces/microbiology , Gastrointestinal Microbiome/genetics , Humans , Male , Mice, Inbred NOD , Mice, SCID , Neoplasm Staging , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/genetics , Steroids/biosynthesis , Time Factors , Verrucomicrobia/genetics , Verrucomicrobia/metabolism
9.
Prostate ; 81(16): 1287-1293, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34516694

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The pathophysiology of the prostate enlargement underlying lower urinary tract symptoms is unknown. Meanwhile, the gut microbiota can contribute to various host conditions. We hypothesized that the gut microbiota plays a role in prostate enlargement. METHODS: We included 128 patients who underwent prostate biopsies at our hospitals between December 2018 and March 2020, excluding those who had used antibiotics within the past 6 months and those who were diagnosed with prostate cancer of cT3 or higher. Patients with prostate volumes ≥30 ml were defined as the prostate-enlargement (PE) group; those with prostate volumes <30 ml were defined as the non-PE group. Their gut microbiotas were analyzed via 16S rRNA metagenomic analyses of rectal swab samples and were compared between the groups. RESULTS: The PE group included 66 patients; the non-PE group included 62 patients. Age, body mass index, and prostate-specific antigen levels did not significantly differ between the groups. Linear discriminant analysis effect size analysis indicated a higher proportion of Firmicutes and Actinobacteria in the PE group and a higher proportion of Bacteroidetes in the non-PE group. The Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes (F/B) ratio was significantly higher in the PE group than in the non-PE group (2.21 ± 0.39 vs. 1.61 ± 0.40, p = 0.015). CONCLUSION: The F/B ratio of the gut microbiota was associated with prostate enlargement. Although the detailed mechanisms are unclear, the gut microbiota might affect prostate enlargement.


Subject(s)
Bacteroidetes/isolation & purification , Firmicutes/isolation & purification , Gastrointestinal Microbiome/physiology , Prostate/pathology , Prostatic Hyperplasia , Prostatic Neoplasms , Biopsy/methods , Biopsy/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Metagenomics/methods , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Organ Size , Prostatic Hyperplasia/diagnosis , Prostatic Hyperplasia/microbiology , Prostatic Neoplasms/microbiology , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Prostatic Neoplasms/physiopathology , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/isolation & purification , Risk Factors
10.
Prostate ; 81(15): 1107-1124, 2021 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34469608

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The 27th Annual Prostate Cancer Foundation (PCF) Scientific Retreat was held virtually from October 20 to 23, 2020. METHODS: The Annual PCF Scientific Retreat is a global scientific research conference that highlights the most promising and cutting edge advances in prostate cancer basic, translational and clinical research, as well as research from other fields with a strong potential for advancing prostate cancer research. RESULTS: Primary areas of research discussed at the 2020 PCF Retreat included: (i) the intersection between prostate cancer and COVID-19 research; (ii) lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic that may address prostate cancer disparities; (iv) the role of the microbiome in cancer; (v) current challenges in treatment of patients with metastatic prostate cancer; (viii) prostate cancer germline genetics and evolutionary genomics; (ix) advances in circulating DNA methylation biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment selection; (x) advances in the development of MYC-targeting therapeutics; (xi) advances in antibody-drug conjugates for the treatment of cancer; (xii) advances for immunotherapy in prostate cancer; and (xiii) updates from other recent prostate cancer clinical trials. CONCLUSIONS: This article summarizes the research presented at the 2020 PCF Scientific Retreat. We hope that dissemination of this knowledge will help to accelerate and direct the next major advances in prostate cancer research and care.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Prostatic Neoplasms , SARS-CoV-2 , Androgens , Animals , Biomarkers, Tumor , Biomedical Research , DNA Methylation , Genetic Predisposition to Disease/ethnology , Genomics , Healthcare Disparities , Humans , Immunotherapy , Male , Mice , Microbiota , Mutation , Pandemics , Prognosis , Prostatic Neoplasms/genetics , Prostatic Neoplasms/microbiology , Prostatic Neoplasms/therapy
11.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 118(32)2021 08 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34341114

ABSTRACT

Prostate adenocarcinoma is the second most commonly diagnosed cancer in men worldwide, and the initiating factors are unknown. Oncogenic TMPRSS2:ERG (ERG+) gene fusions are facilitated by DNA breaks and occur in up to 50% of prostate cancers. Infection-driven inflammation is implicated in the formation of ERG+ fusions, and we hypothesized that these fusions initiate in early inflammation-associated prostate cancer precursor lesions, such as proliferative inflammatory atrophy (PIA), prior to cancer development. We investigated whether bacterial prostatitis is associated with ERG+ precancerous lesions in unique cases with active bacterial infections at the time of radical prostatectomy. We identified a high frequency of ERG+ non-neoplastic-appearing glands in these cases, including ERG+ PIA transitioning to early invasive cancer. These lesions were positive for ERG protein by immunohistochemistry and ERG messenger RNA by in situ hybridization. We additionally verified TMPRSS2:ERG genomic rearrangements in precursor lesions using tricolor fluorescence in situ hybridization. Identification of rearrangement patterns combined with whole-prostate mapping in three dimensions confirmed multiple (up to eight) distinct ERG+ precancerous lesions in infected cases. We further identified the pathogen-derived genotoxin colibactin as a potential source of DNA breaks in clinical cases as well as cultured prostate cells. Overall, we provide evidence that bacterial infections can initiate driver gene alterations in prostate cancer. In addition, our observations indicate that infection-induced ERG+ fusions are an early alteration in the carcinogenic process and that PIA may serve as a direct precursor to prostate cancer.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Infections/genetics , Prostatic Neoplasms/genetics , Prostatic Neoplasms/microbiology , Serine Endopeptidases/genetics , Atrophy , Bacterial Infections/complications , Bacterial Infections/pathology , DNA Breaks , Humans , Male , Oncogene Fusion , Peptides/genetics , Polyketides , Prostate/microbiology , Prostate/pathology , Prostatectomy , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery , Prostatitis/genetics , Prostatitis/microbiology , Prostatitis/pathology , Transcriptional Regulator ERG/genetics
12.
Cancer Sci ; 112(8): 3125-3135, 2021 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34051009

ABSTRACT

We have found that intestinal bacteria and their metabolites, short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), promote cancer growth in prostate cancer (PCa) mouse models. To clarify the association between gut microbiota and PCa in humans, we analyzed the gut microbiota profiles of men with suspected PCa. One hundred and fifty-two Japanese men undergoing prostate biopsies (96 with cancer and 56 without cancer) were included in the study and randomly divided into two cohorts: a discovery cohort (114 samples) and a test cohort (38 samples). The gut microbiota was compared between two groups, a high-risk group (men with Grade group 2 or higher PCa) and a negative + low-risk group (men with negative biopsy or Grade group 1 PCa), using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. The relative abundances of Rikenellaceae, Alistipes, and Lachnospira, all SCFA-producing bacteria, were significantly increased in high-risk group. In receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the index calculated from the abundance of 18 bacterial genera which were selected by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression detected high-risk PCa in the discovery cohort with higher accuracy than the prostate specific antigen test (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.85 vs 0.74). Validation of the index in the test cohort showed similar results (AUC = 0.81 vs 0.67). The specific bacterial taxa were associated with high-risk PCa. The gut microbiota profile could be a novel useful marker for the detection of high-risk PCa and could contribute to the carcinogenesis of PCa.


Subject(s)
Bacteria/classification , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/genetics , Sequence Analysis, DNA/methods , Aged , Bacteria/genetics , Bacteria/isolation & purification , DNA, Bacterial/genetics , DNA, Ribosomal/genetics , Gastrointestinal Microbiome , Humans , Japan , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Grading , Phylogeny , Prostatic Neoplasms/microbiology
13.
BMC Infect Dis ; 21(1): 403, 2021 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33933029

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Carnobacterium species are lactic acid-producing Gram-positive bacteria that have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and Health Canada for use as a food bio-preservative. The use of live bacteria as a food additive and its potential risk of infections in immunocompromised patients are not well understood. CASE PRESENTATION: An 81-year-old male with a history of metastatic prostate cancer on androgen deprivation therapy and chronic steroids presented to our hospital with a 2-week history of productive cough, dyspnea, altered mentation, and fever. Extensive computed tomography imaging revealed multifocal pneumonia without other foci of infection. He was diagnosed with pneumonia and empirically treated with ceftriaxone and vancomycin. Blood cultures from admission later returned positive for Carnobacterium inhibens. He achieved clinical recovery with step-down to oral amoxicillin/clavulanic acid for a total 7-day course of antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS: This is the fourth reported case of bacteremia with Carnobacterium spp. isolated from humans. This case highlights the need to better understand the pathogenicity and disease spectrum of bacteria used in the food industry for bio-preservation, especially in immunocompromised patients.


Subject(s)
Bacteremia/microbiology , Carnobacterium , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Aged, 80 and over , Amoxicillin-Potassium Clavulanate Combination/therapeutic use , Androgen Antagonists/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacteremia/drug therapy , Blood Culture , Canada , Carnobacterium/isolation & purification , Carnobacterium/pathogenicity , Ceftriaxone/therapeutic use , Food Microbiology , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/blood , Humans , Immunocompromised Host , Male , Pneumonia, Bacterial/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Bacterial/microbiology , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/microbiology , Vancomycin/therapeutic use
14.
Benef Microbes ; 12(3): 239-248, 2021 Jun 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33789551

ABSTRACT

Implicated in several chronic diseases, the gastrointestinal microbiome is hypothesised to influence carcinogenesis. We compared faecal microbiota of newly diagnosed treatment-naïve overweight and obese cancer patients and matched controls. Cases were enrolled in presurgical weight-loss trials for breast (NCT02224807) and prostate (NCT01886677) cancers and had a body mass index (BMI) ≥25 kg/m2. Cancer-free controls were matched 1:1 by age (±5 years), race, gender, and BMI (±5 kg/m2). All participants provided faecal samples; isolated bacterial DNA were PCR amplified at the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene and analysed using the QIIME pipeline. Tests compared cases versus controls, then separately by gender. Microbial alpha-diversity and beta-diversity were assessed, and relative abundance of Operational Taxonomic Units (OTU's) were compared at the genus level, with false discovery rate (FDR) correction. 22 overweight and obese cancer patients were matched with 22 cancer-free controls, with an average BMI of 30.5±4.3 kg/m2, age 54.4±5.3 years, and 54.5% were black. Fourteen matches were made between breast cancer cases and healthy female controls, and 8 matches were made with prostate cancer cases and healthy male controls. Comparison of all cases and controls revealed no differences in alpha diversity, though prostate cancer patients had higher Chao1 (P=0.006) and Observed Species (P=0.036) than cancer-free males. Beta-diversity metrics were significantly different between cases and controls (P<0.03 for all tests in whole sample and in men), though only unweighted Unifrac was different in women (P=0.005). Kruskal Wallis tests indicated significant differences among 16 genera in all matches, 9 in female, and 51 in male. This study suggests the faecal microbiota of treatment-naive breast and prostate cancer patients differs from controls, though larger samples are needed to substantiate these findings. Trial registration: NIH Clinical Trials, NCT01886677, NCT02224807, registered 26 June 2013, 25 Aug 2014 (respectively) - retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01886677; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02224807.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/microbiology , Gastrointestinal Microbiome , Prostatic Neoplasms/microbiology , Case-Control Studies , Feces/microbiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Obesity/microbiology , Overweight/microbiology , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
15.
Arch Microbiol ; 203(3): 1221-1229, 2021 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33620523

ABSTRACT

Salicylic acid, widely distributed in the whole plant kingdom, is a benzoic acid derivative acting as a signal substance in plants, but could be related to differences in cancer incidence, as many herbs and spices contain high amounts. Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG) is one of the best-known lactic acid bacteria that has been studied for over 30 years. Probiotic and/or commensal bacteria of the human microbiota are known to respond to diet constituents. Therefore, the present study aims at investigating the possible effects of salicylic acid on the probiotic properties of LGG, and in vitro cytotoxic effects of combination of salicylic acid and LGG on human colon and prostate cancer cells. Salicylic acid significantly (p < 0.05) increased co-aggregation of LGG with E. coli (~ twofold) and anti-oxidant properties. Furthermore, it also induced the cytotoxic effects of LGG against human colon cancer cells. These results suggest that interaction of LGG with salicylic acid can exert more probiotic properties.


Subject(s)
Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus/physiology , Salicylic Acid/pharmacology , Synbiotics , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Survival/drug effects , Colon/cytology , Colon/microbiology , Escherichia coli/drug effects , Escherichia coli/physiology , Humans , Male , Microbiota/physiology , Probiotics/pharmacology , Prostatic Neoplasms/microbiology
16.
Nutrients ; 12(9)2020 Aug 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32878054

ABSTRACT

The human microbiota shows pivotal roles in urologic health and disease. Emerging studies indicate that gut and urinary microbiomes can impact several urological diseases, both benignant and malignant, acting particularly on prostate inflammation and prostate cancer. Indeed, the microbiota exerts its influence on prostate cancer initiation and/or progression mechanisms through the regulation of chronic inflammation, apoptotic processes, cytokines, and hormonal production in response to different pathogenic noxae. Additionally, therapies' and drugs' responses are influenced in their efficacy and tolerability by microbiota composition. Due to this complex potential interconnection between prostate cancer and microbiota, exploration and understanding of the involved relationships is pivotal to evaluate a potential therapeutic application in clinical practice. Several natural compounds, moreover, seem to have relevant effects, directly or mediated by microbiota, on urologic health, posing the human microbiota at the crossroad between prostatic inflammation and prostate cancer development. Here, we aim to analyze the most recent evidence regarding the possible crosstalk between prostate, microbiome, and inflammation.


Subject(s)
Dietary Supplements , Gastrointestinal Microbiome , Inflammation/microbiology , Prostatic Neoplasms/microbiology , Acetylcysteine/pharmacology , Carnitine/pharmacology , Chronic Disease , Disease Progression , Fatty Acids, Unsaturated/pharmacology , Humans , Male , Monoterpenes/pharmacology , Polyphenols/pharmacology , Prostate/microbiology , Prostate/physiopathology
17.
Nature ; 579(7800): 567-574, 2020 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32214244

ABSTRACT

Systematic characterization of the cancer microbiome provides the opportunity to develop techniques that exploit non-human, microorganism-derived molecules in the diagnosis of a major human disease. Following recent demonstrations that some types of cancer show substantial microbial contributions1-10, we re-examined whole-genome and whole-transcriptome sequencing studies in The Cancer Genome Atlas11 (TCGA) of 33 types of cancer from treatment-naive patients (a total of 18,116 samples) for microbial reads, and found unique microbial signatures in tissue and blood within and between most major types of cancer. These TCGA blood signatures remained predictive when applied to patients with stage Ia-IIc cancer and cancers lacking any genomic alterations currently measured on two commercial-grade cell-free tumour DNA platforms, despite the use of very stringent decontamination analyses that discarded up to 92.3% of total sequence data. In addition, we could discriminate among samples from healthy, cancer-free individuals (n = 69) and those from patients with multiple types of cancer (prostate, lung, and melanoma; 100 samples in total) solely using plasma-derived, cell-free microbial nucleic acids. This potential microbiome-based oncology diagnostic tool warrants further exploration.


Subject(s)
Microbiota/genetics , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Neoplasms/microbiology , Plasma/microbiology , Case-Control Studies , Cohort Studies , DNA, Bacterial/blood , DNA, Viral/blood , Datasets as Topic , Female , Humans , Liquid Biopsy , Lung Neoplasms/blood , Lung Neoplasms/diagnosis , Lung Neoplasms/microbiology , Male , Melanoma/blood , Melanoma/diagnosis , Melanoma/microbiology , Neoplasms/blood , Prostatic Neoplasms/blood , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Prostatic Neoplasms/microbiology , Reproducibility of Results
18.
Oncology (Williston Park) ; 34(3)2020 Mar 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32212131

ABSTRACT

Indications for checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) are growing rapidly within the field of oncology; however, they continue to have heterogeneous outcomes in different cancers. Other than mismatch repair deficiency, there are no consistent tests to determine a tumor's susceptibility. By exploring factors beyond the cancer cell, researchers have learned that the efficacy of CPIs may be governed by a myriad of variable host factors, including the tumor microenvironment (TME) and gut microbiome (GMB). The GMB serves as one of the primary organs of immune defense and has well-established local and systemic effects on the host immune system. Recent investigations suggest that the GMB also affects the TME. This review article discusses the concepts of a TME and a GMB and their effects on responses to CPIs. It also reviews recent research investigating these 3 topics, and how it can be applied to using CPIs in prostate cancer. By highlighting this important pathophysiologic process, we hope to provide insight into a possible explanation for differences in interindividual response to CPIs, discuss a potential method for transferring treatment efficacy between patients, and propose a method for expanding the use of CPIs to prostate cancer.


Subject(s)
Gastrointestinal Microbiome , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Prostatic Neoplasms/microbiology , Prostatic Neoplasms/therapy , Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic , Humans , Male , Prostatic Neoplasms/immunology , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Tumor Microenvironment/immunology
19.
Oncology (Williston Park) ; 34(3)2020 Mar 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32212136

ABSTRACT

Pneumocystis jirovecii, formerly known as Pneumocystis carinii, is an atypical fungal pathogen best known for causing Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP). The epidemiology of PCP is changing such that patients without HIV infection now comprise the largest subset of individuals diagnosed with PCP. While those with hematologic malignancies and organ transplants are at greatest risk for non-HIV-related PCP, this review will focus on PCP in patients with solid tumors. They are at risk for PCP due to their chemotherapy regimens and use of steroids in the management of various complications of treatment, and possibly because of the immunosuppressive effect of the cancer itself. In particular, patients with solid tumors being treated for metastatic spinal cord compression are at great risk for PCP. Patients with solid tumors and PCP face greater mortality than those with HIV infection. Multiple reviews have attempted to describe the ideal regimen of corticosteroids for metastatic spinal cord compression, but there is little consensus. We present 2 cases of patients with metastatic spinal cord compression due to prostate cancer undergoing radiation therapy and treatment with corticosteroids. These cases highlight the difficulties in predicting the length of corticosteroid therapy and the dangers that patients face without appropriate prophylaxis. This article will also provide a review of the current guidelines for PCP prophylaxis in patients undergoing treatment for metastatic spinal cord compression. We recommend empiric treatment with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole or dapsone in those patients with a sulfa allergy in all patients with solid tumors when any high-dose steroids are started for the treatment of metastatic spinal cord compression. Further research is needed to assess the epidemiology of PCP in patients with solid tumors and additional trials are necessary to refine PCP prophylaxis.


Subject(s)
Adrenal Cortex Hormones/adverse effects , Pneumocystis carinii/drug effects , Pneumonia, Pneumocystis/etiology , Prostatic Neoplasms/microbiology , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Spinal Cord Compression/drug therapy , Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination/therapeutic use , Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Fatal Outcome , Humans , Male , Neoplasm Metastasis , Pneumonia, Pneumocystis/chemically induced , Pneumonia, Pneumocystis/prevention & control , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Spinal Cord Compression/etiology , Spinal Cord Compression/microbiology , Spinal Cord Compression/pathology
20.
Int J Mol Sci ; 21(4)2020 Feb 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32093338

ABSTRACT

The incidence of prostate cancer (PCa) displays widespread regional differences, probably owing to differences in dietary habits. Nutrients, including fat, protein, carbohydrates, vitamins (vitamin A, D, and E), and polyphenols, potentially affect PCa pathogenesis and progression, as previously reported using animal models; however, clinical studies have reported controversial results for almost all nutrients. The effects of these nutrients may be manifested through various mechanisms including inflammation, antioxidant effects, and the action of sex hormones. Dietary patterns including the Western and Prudent patterns also influence the risk of PCa. Recent studies reported that the gut microbiota contribute to tumorigenesis in some organs. Diet composition and lifestyle have a direct and profound effect on the gut bacteria. Human studies reported an increase in the abundance of specific gut bacteria in PCa patients. Although there are few studies concerning their relationship, diet and nutrition could influence PCa, and this could be mediated by gut microbiota. An intervention of dietary patterns could contribute to the prevention of PCa. An intervention targeting dietary patterns may thus help prevent PCa.


Subject(s)
Carcinogenesis , Diet, Western/adverse effects , Feeding Behavior , Gastrointestinal Microbiome , Nutritional Status , Prostatic Neoplasms , Humans , Male , Prostatic Neoplasms/etiology , Prostatic Neoplasms/metabolism , Prostatic Neoplasms/microbiology , Prostatic Neoplasms/prevention & control , Risk Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...